From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id OJk8GraoOl8geAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:56:38 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id EFlEFraoOl8/MgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:56:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEE629403A8 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:56:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37176 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k7hUy-0005JU-K5 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:56:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k7gy0-0002Ed-MQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:22:32 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:37429) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k7gxy-0004Nu-JY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:22:32 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776935C007A; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:22:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:22:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; bh=wo3SFU/4lqAwmb0ivV6/zBGWHW47V551ewRG9fbKuV8=; b=Wt36Oc44 WpsDsA7NSCXRdoPMl9H06u+rrvj3LK21HDNtpJKfZ47tLCUx75uS32cGj1dwNuI+ iirCAvdFIkP+s1hcpELDoFJVSnzptvH3NXehNd3649Ok7CP/WId7/El7NUzPY+CZ XZdyLr2M22GGhXOBPxjDXSxvG93WqRwwgAVgORcgNnJyt9dkxwkhlOhZY8wE5+i8 SLGyrkLPzolPfZESYuJer1NKKNFJUfwAbqCMtXIy1BLyfWRHAJQZsGqFbYByLQUc qqIlNNwQIRc8B3lqmub98T8I6ls0U/OQifUpkKkZH31UZT2fpBPAZJrKwcv5nb2L I5fRBO5fNpRsuw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedruddtfedgkeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufhffffkfgggtgfgsehtqhertddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefvihhmohht hhihucfurghmphhlvgcuoehsrghmphhlvghtsehnghihrhhordgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpedvtdevuddukeevgefggffhtefhueffkeegkeevudeftedugefgtdefheef jeffieenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeegrdduudeirddukeeird eggeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehs rghmphhlvghtsehnghihrhhordgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: from mrblack (74-116-186-44.qc.dsl.ebox.net [74.116.186.44]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C224C30600A3; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:22:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Timothy Sample To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: merge wip-haskell? References: <87mu386vk5.fsf@elephly.net> <87h7tes60f.fsf@ngyro.com> <87r1si5j23.fsf@elephly.net> <87a6z4qw5s.fsf@ngyro.com> <87k0y236ce.fsf@elephly.net> <87v9hkqq1u.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 11:22:27 -0400 Message-ID: <875z9hguvg.fsf@ngyro.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.25; envelope-from=samplet@ngyro.com; helo=out1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/17 11:22:28 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=Wt36Oc44; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.99 X-TUID: t8EEre2GM6NJ Hey Ricardo, Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Timothy Sample writes: >> >>> I just pushed =E2=80=9Cwip-haskell-updates-2=E2=80=9D which integrates = my work from >>> . I left the original branch intact >>> to make it easy to compare. >> >> I rebased this on top of =E2=80=9Cmaster=E2=80=9D and pushed it as =E2= =80=9Cwip-haskell=E2=80=9D. I >> updated my changes to pandoc and pandoc-citeproc so that the statically >> linked variants are now separate packages. >> >> The evaluations on ci.guix.gnu.org failed due to a few minor bugs in the >> extra-directories code (missing =E2=80=9Cmatch=E2=80=9D case for inputs = with declared >> outputs, and a missing list wrapper in one package). I fixed up that >> commit [...]. Sorry for the mistakes. Thanks for fixing them up. :) > I just merged =E2=80=9Cwip-haskell=E2=80=9D into =E2=80=9Cmaster=E2=80=9D= (after merging =E2=80=9Cmaster=E2=80=9D into > =E2=80=9Cwip-haskell=E2=80=9D). Fantastic! I noticed a few surprising failures like Agda and git-annex. With git-annex, I had to create a fake "static" output to appease the daemon (cf. e13fefbcffa50144d9301d67b61928ac3c964fb3). It=E2=80=99s a little funn= y, but I suppose can=E2=80=99t be helped until there is progress on . Is it true that now that =E2=80=9Cwip-haskell=E2=80=9D is removed from Cuir= ass there=E2=80=99s no longer any way to see the build failures? I can=E2=80=99t find them, bu= t my Cuirass skills are rather mediocre. :) Either way, I have fast-enough machine I can use to track down some of the other failures. Maybe I will try and do it along with the Stackage update. -- Tim