From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id WGb0M3xGlWQVDAEASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 09:15:08 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id mI43M3xGlWRT8wAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 09:15:08 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A73A7118E4 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 09:15:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qCb07-0004AY-SI; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 03:14:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qCb00-00049n-NT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 03:14:28 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qCazz-0000ok-2h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 03:14:28 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-51bdd67a306so265800a12.3 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:14:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687504463; x=1690096463; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to:from :user-agent:references:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IUSku+NCwfTVzdDSvWgs1IV+2laTJN+rtPN3QgCOK0M=; b=HiFIFQyuKHLCP4qDUsMW/xxc7NUpb9/SllKjfYiFAMcTTkeHVdnGbnGbVBlvMdwhwL NlZzA/JoD5erLNrexGc+SNjuABuIZNW1BUB4XAEYYajElGg12vf+4Y0YDaK7+yF2WE8b UWT13BD2tIWmyKSMLpX11bPs8Vce/YKYr2IVYyt7CkVjTaIiRSKicKf9Kkwu4y3YMUcT rrN/8gOcpTk42Hb4yKkGI0y15cDyPI9EekvmuWSDyfyk6SYTnPDMnel4rFSdguxNHXUC bYTPjrV1rNBi7TuNVD+oIc8QKw863jf/hOBSxtHpzukKx5vUPFDPrZQHLmez88dGsmSI YLbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687504463; x=1690096463; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to:from :user-agent:references:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=IUSku+NCwfTVzdDSvWgs1IV+2laTJN+rtPN3QgCOK0M=; b=BiyTyDDHALuvAwByzvj7H6W6C4vYNPald7Fch+4qKH/bp5DJY68Ivj2Qy9hh4xBcp6 JmPl7EDQurMtZkCmy+hq822uO9RwlJJwKtywVsjSnuVjJhGcEtXXCcIB87+gbC+mRDrP kK1Ww0ymB3kytdJU9OVTNuOHeeNJl87Q8KmLGvGCxxfgMmqGg6wHX7uXrfSgocwzhdNK M8jZzsknL2E35LLFXjSZyd8lOV/hIf/Qrzc3QtQXWWHrmW5LaBllOniuyZ0g5o5VFmER iFMDm7vbb5Zukcszti2zDmTWgGFlCS2nigiRCnVfL/sPyKXdftmbT3lYR0oNOyYXPP8H jQqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyP0aESyptS6ggUoIWVXp45mhPBXeHJOsJb8OuhpRFzUkrO8xsJ XNwcaYlSXmuPyATGJkhqOUn5iW5LXe4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4R6tpWRNDHyoX7e25WkOQRZKu3E9T31eYaZSIi9qNqWzsdqY29QYzp2y4zChPSWntBzb4vgw== X-Received: by 2002:a50:ee96:0:b0:51a:3307:8ec6 with SMTP id f22-20020a50ee96000000b0051a33078ec6mr15182232edr.11.1687504463265; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (h120217.upc-h.chello.nl. [62.194.120.217]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o26-20020aa7c7da000000b0051bed60f333sm1122987eds.48.2023.06.23.00.14.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:14:22 -0700 (PDT) References: <87h6qzzll7.fsf@ngraves.fr> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.2; emacs 28.2 From: pinoaffe To: Nicolas Graves Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Maybe a way to get a few more developpers to work on Guix ? Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 09:02:09 +0200 In-reply-to: <87h6qzzll7.fsf@ngraves.fr> Message-ID: <875y7e4pma.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52c; envelope-from=pinoaffe@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x52c.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1687504508; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=IUSku+NCwfTVzdDSvWgs1IV+2laTJN+rtPN3QgCOK0M=; b=bgZjherp/SD9AHBC8U67UionzRWX9fjyjy8Isx31Y/GhS8VG+lSxzwsNSsvJiTK6oNkIyD 5Eby8m08pFdZWO4wVoel0ZSaKls+wokcuSOTVwB6PlKfoYZCOYpXJZA7aKqWucloqmOdBi gmHAJkkWM6sRO2Dt1rnHA6GDddRWb0+A8ig5eYVPwN+XuzSQKYKdSF9povtX6ZJXcIDoVP t+JVyLqdY6XQsUbiHqP3N7aNu1h1r/buNIF1YgaE0vOJYjxBpEkGLkCpmvgVhujZXyqZt8 rKhfHRCylJeMg18sECaG036/grPvDmc56tTmet6K9fGBrkAnshULv4c1ITn4rg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=HiFIFQyu; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1687504508; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=U/mfq7ZGW6tEP/nlKJwJeo/wZ9DKhjlVyWvSdRJxB/p/8LGWCuJOVh4EZzxII/0cpiZuzj H2X0ZZX+CG7llPqjemi0KDXpIozx5hMa/LyepKzo8SfLSrWqkTBUtn6ViPbDiqX4EsHP3w YSsIwvRgRaVnxjGeuCvNcv5TFGxlCB4kBrGRO1TuXju1y4qniIx0y+HyUNlSH7mAkRCDlz 6BHCcptzeHDNUJGUeHH55KtVIN+1bJ9ESw7hIEXbKk8V20v8VIc7RVEqkeCGqBel/UuTxn K+wqC5dnSZcvhUjdfcEUvMp5Nq8ZUlr5jMVoPXde0xfhNCCS14eVBGx/gYaZIw== X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.91 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=HiFIFQyu; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A73A7118E4 X-Spam-Score: -3.91 X-TUID: 4ehBeKjr/YLX Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." writes: > ... code generation through LLMs. This could itself help Guix generate > (and fix) package definitions. I really don't think that that'd be a good match for Guix. Writing package definitions is easy, can be assisted with a snippet (such as provided in /path/to/guix/etc/snippets/yas/scheme-mode/guix-package) and writing a package definition takes hardly more work than verifying that an LLM-provided package definition is reasonable. In other words, I don't think a LLM could make it easier/faster to write package definitions. Kind regards, pinoaffe