Hello, Ian Eure writes: > Disregard this, I continued thinking after sending the email (as one does) and > realized that any managed file will be a link into the store -- so if the system > is reconfigured with no build-machines or channels *and* the corresponding file > is a store link, it should be removed; otherwise, it should remain untouched. I > can work with this. Will this correctly handle cases where user is managing the file using for example extra-special-file? I wonder whether fat-warning approach would not be better. Tomas -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.