unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Christopher Howard <christopher@librehacker.com>
To: Divya Ranjan via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
	distribution." <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Cc: Divya Ranjan <divya@subvertising.org>
Subject: Re: On the "next" packages, and packaging confusion.
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:57:45 -0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xoevn2e.fsf@librehacker.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Divya Ranjan via's message of "Mon, 11 Nov 2024 05:17:20 +0000 (1 week, 4 days, 18 hours ago)"

Hi, I'm not a Guix maintainer, but just thought I would mention that, regarding Emacs:

- There is an official, distinct branch for the next release (in this case, Emacs 30)
- They do have official "pre-test" releases, in the year before the release, which in this case were 30.0.91 and 30.0.92.
- Before that, i.e., before the pre-test releases, it appeared that guix was camping on 30.0.50 (or was it 51)?. I was fine with that, because the important thing (to me) is that the guix package emacs-next could provides a package definition that I could use (with shell -D) to build any commit in the 30 branch. I'm not sure, off-hand, how 30.0.50 was picked exactly.

So, for me at least, the important thing is that emacs-next is taken from the branch for the next release. And if it gets adjusted at the time the pre-tests are release, that is also nice.

-- 
Christopher Howard


             reply	other threads:[~2024-11-22 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-22 23:57 Christopher Howard [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-11-23 15:34 On the "next" packages, and packaging confusion Sharlatan Hellseher
2024-11-23 15:53 ` Divya Ranjan
2024-11-11  5:17 Divya Ranjan via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875xoevn2e.fsf@librehacker.com \
    --to=christopher@librehacker.com \
    --cc=divya@subvertising.org \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).