From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=) Subject: Re: New year, new name! Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 23:11:21 +0100 Message-ID: <874ms4vpx2.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> References: <87egra60mo.fsf@gnu.org> <87k311v52t.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <87egr9p5kj.fsf@gnu.org> <54AAC19F.6020402@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47610) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8Frx-0003ta-O6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 17:11:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8Frw-0001OT-Tn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 17:11:25 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]:37645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8Frw-0001OP-N8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 17:11:24 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id m14so8676711wev.14 for ; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 14:11:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54AAC19F.6020402@openmailbox.org> ("Felipe \=\?utf-8\?Q\?L\=C3\=B3\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?pez\=22's\?\= message of "Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:53:51 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Felipe L=C3=B3pez writes: > On 05/01/15 11:15, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> I agree with what you write, that is, we don=E2=80=99t want to do too mu= ch >> branding around that name, and instead emphasize GNU. In my view, this >> is indeed some sort of a code name for use in technical docs and such. FYI, I did not receive the e-mail from which the above quote by Ludovic seems to be, though I can see it in the ML archives. Perhaps the ML software had a glitch and didn't send it to me. I'm happy to hear that everyone's in agreement. :-) Taylan