From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu packages: Clean up synopses and descriptions.
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 13:07:54 +0300
Message-ID: <874ml13hj9.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87wpy0nygt.fsf@gmail.com>
	<20150716044011.5698360e@openmailbox.org> <87a8uwyu4v.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87fv4ndint.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv4ndkhy.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87fv4mtr3x.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46164)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1ZGP2E-0000Hf-OF
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 06:07:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1ZGP2B-0005zZ-Ii
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 06:07:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87fv4mtr3x.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 17 Jul 2015 23:24:18 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2015-07-18 00:24 +0300) wrote:

> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2015-07-16 22:08 +0300) wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Since we have our own conventions that are not necessarily coincide with
>> the upstream conventions, I believe it would be better to prefer our
>> synopses/descriptions instead.
>
> I discussed with Karl Berry and Brandon Invergo who take care of it to
> make sure we have roughly the same rules.  I=E2=80=99ve also adjusted =E2=
=80=98guix
> lint=E2=80=99 accordingly (see notably 105c260.)
>
> So I think we should keep using them and email bug-womb@gnu.org when we
> want a change (see <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-womb>.)

Now I see, thanks for the pointers.

--=20
Alex