From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] emacs: Add 'guix-devel-use-current-module'. Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 16:00:29 +0200 Message-ID: <874mkrggsi.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <1437814197-6321-1-git-send-email-alezost@gmail.com> <1437814197-6321-5-git-send-email-alezost@gmail.com> <87r3nwrrze.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87mvyj2ufq.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJMVj-0003N9-Ag for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 10:02:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJMVe-0007ag-Be for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 10:02:39 -0400 Received: from smtp11.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.45]:46422) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJMVe-0007aL-2q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 10:02:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mvyj2ufq.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Sun, 26 Jul 2015 11:29:29 +0300") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost writes: > Mathieu Lirzin (2015-07-25 21:51 +0300) wrote: >> What do you think about integrating it in section "Contributing" instead? > > Maybe, I don't have a preference here. Since it's not really related to package management, I think it would be preferable to move this in the node "The perfect Setup". >> I remember reading somewhere in the Emacs manual that "C-c " is >> meant for user customization in the global key map (can't remember where >> ;)). So what suggesting "C-c C-u" which is a mode specific key binding? > > I don't know whether there is such (or any other) suggestion anywhere. > But since that was just an example, not a recommendation (not even a > suggestion), I think it doesn't matter what key binding to use there. > Do you have any preference? What about "C-H-M-s-u"? :-) I agree it's not really important for advanced Emacs users who will have no problem choosing something adapted to their setup. Nonetheless IMHO consistency and simplicity helps newcomers to understand, So I will be in favour of anything that follows this convention. :) --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (global-set-key (kbd "C-c ") foo-function-callable-anywhere) (define-key bar-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-") 'foo-function-for-bar-mode) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- -- Mathieu Lirzin