From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add oslo.i18n.
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 23:01:48 +0200
Message-ID: <874mj76z43.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1441148656-303-1-git-send-email-tipecaml@gmail.com>
	<1441148656-303-3-git-send-email-tipecaml@gmail.com>
	<87vbbqdkdl.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAJ=RwfauoYBqQrTmH2G-SCSo4MOy+vRXoHNFUL+PU1d3yA+1Zg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87613oboje.fsf@gnu.org> <55ECA8EF.80709@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50407)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ZYh4V-0008BY-Gl
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2015 17:01:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ZYh4R-00074G-EV
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2015 17:01:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <55ECA8EF.80709@gmail.com> (Cyril Roelandt's message of "Sun, 06
	Sep 2015 22:58:23 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com> skribis:

> On 09/05/2015 10:26 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> I had a vague recollection that maybe setuptools was now part of Python
>> core, so when I packaged =E2=80=98patches=E2=80=99 I removed it and ever=
ything was fine.
>
> That does ring a bell, but I don't know for sure. Anyway I tried
> compiling python-oslo.i18n without python-setuptools, and it fails with
> python 2, so I'd rather keep it for now. WDYT?

Yes, definitely.  This counterexample invalidates my theory.  ;-)

Ludo=E2=80=99.