From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: custom-gcc: Delete broken or conflicting executables.
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 22:51:33 +0100
Message-ID: <874mc4pyca.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20160311151441.0543ca4d@debian-netbook>
	<idjwpp2u00m.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<idjvb4mtvkz.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33801)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1agfpW-0000vA-8X
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:51:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1agfpR-0000ub-Ao
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:51:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <idjvb4mtvkz.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's
	message of "Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:13:00 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> skribis:

> Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> writes:

[...]

>> I=E2=80=99ll investigate this.  It=E2=80=99s odd that =E2=80=9C-lgfortra=
n=E2=80=9D cannot be found only
>> because we deleted useless wrappers.
>
> I found that for randomjungle the native inputs must now also include
>
>     ("gfortran" ,gfortran "lib")
>
> in *addition* to the usual
>
>     ("gfortran" ,gfortran)
>
> I can prepare a patch for the three broken packages, but I wonder why
> this is necessary.  =E2=80=9Cgfortran=E2=80=9D alone does not install =E2=
=80=9Clibgfortran.so=E2=80=9D,
> only the =E2=80=9Clib=E2=80=9D output does.

For GCC we hack the =E2=80=9Clib=E2=80=9D spec (as show by =E2=80=98gcc -du=
mpspecs=E2=80=99) so that it
has an extra -L for libgcc_s (search for =E2=80=98GNU_USER_TARGET_LIB_SPEC=
=E2=80=99 in
gcc.scm).

Should something similar be done here?

Ludo=E2=80=99.