From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Publishing an Official Statement on Self-Hosted Compilers
Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 10:29:47 +0200
Message-ID: <874ma71vno.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1462459952.3184683.599099897.2F5459D9@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<87zis37b14.fsf@gnu.org>
	<1462554829.3557989.600286737.0D1BE258@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56196)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1azgZh-0001j9-N5
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 04:29:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1azgZb-00035k-Og
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 04:29:56 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1462554829.3557989.600286737.0D1BE258@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	(Alex Griffin's message of "Fri, 06 May 2016 12:13:49 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Alex Griffin <a@ajgrf.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Alex Griffin <a@ajgrf.com> skribis:

> On Fri, May 6, 2016, at 05:09 AM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> I think it=E2=80=99s a good idea!  A lot of the work to fix this issue w=
ill be
>> to raise awareness among compiler writers and invite them to have a
>> bootstrapping story like you describe.
>>=20
>> Other people in the reproducible-builds community are interested in this
>> so yes, it sounds like the right place to discuss it.
>>=20
>> Would you like to get it started?  :-)  We could discuss it on
>> rb-general@lists.reproducible-builds.org=C2=B9 and here.
>>=20
>> Thanks,
>> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>
> Sure, this weekend I'll put together an outline of everything I think we
> should include and then solicit more feedback.

Awesome, thank you!

Ludo=E2=80=99.