From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com>
Subject: Re: Mail to this list is slow?
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 22:48:09 +0000
Message-ID: <874m568c7q.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
References: <20160922132746.GA8000@jocasta.intra>
	<87shss6nlz.fsf@thor.jamestechnotes.com>
	<87eg4bdge1.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87zimz7niw.fsf@elephly.net>
	<20160922234835.GA11190@jasmine>
	<a0f5b8a2-9e63-2e5e-0116-1f5573860928@tobias.gr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50520)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bnZGq-0002YW-2A
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:48:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bnZGl-0005jV-S2
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:48:39 -0400
Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:47969)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bnZGl-0005jH-Kw
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:48:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <a0f5b8a2-9e63-2e5e-0116-1f5573860928@tobias.gr>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>, leo@famulari.name, john@darrington.wattle.id.au
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> writes:

> [ Unknown signature status ]
> John & others,
>
> On 23/09/16 01:48, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> I had this experience, too. I assume it's some sort of spam mitigation.
>
> I can't speak for the FSF admins, but that[0] is almost certainly the
> reason.
>
> On the other hand, I often receive others' mail with delays up to
> several hours. I hope this isn't a common experience, and blame my mail
> host. They'll soon be replaced with GuixSD.

No, I use an commercial email hoster (just started to drop my own domain
name recently which used runbox already) with lots of resources and
bandwith, and I experience long delays in the last days.

> Kind regards,
>
> T G-R
>
> [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylisting
>

-- 
              ng0