From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: gcj: Fix build on armhf.
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:30:54 +0100
Message-ID: <874m2u173l.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <20161125213515.14677-1-rekado@elephly.net>
	<20161125213515.14677-2-rekado@elephly.net>
	<20161126053202.GA16546@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50167)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1cAgoc-0002Pu-RD
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 12:31:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1cAgoZ-0003ym-Ky
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 12:31:06 -0500
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:21407)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1cAgoZ-0003yf-CT
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 12:31:03 -0500
In-reply-to: <20161126053202.GA16546@jasmine>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
http://elephly.net
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:35:15PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/patches/gcj-arm-mode.patch: New file.
>> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add patch.
>> * gnu/packages/gcc.scm (gcj): Add patch.
>> [arguments]: Delete failing tests.
>
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/gcj-arm-mode.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/gcj-arm-mode.patch
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..16fdb5e
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/gcj-arm-mode.patch
>> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
>> +Taken from
>> +https://sources.debian.net/data/main/g/gcc-4.9/4.9.2-10/debian/patches/gcj-arm-mode.diff
>> +
>> +# DP: For armhf, force arm mode instead of thumb mode
>> +
>> +--- a/src/libjava/configure.host
>> ++++ b/src/libjava/configure.host
>> +@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@
>> +     ;;
>> + esac
>> + 
>> ++# on armhf force arm mode
>> ++libgcj_flags="${libgcj_flags} -marm"
>> ++
>
> Is the patch applied only on armhf machines?

It is applied to the sources but they affect the behaviour on armhf
only AFAICS.

-- 
Ricardo