From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: mupdf: Fix some security problems in bundled mujs. Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 21:56:29 +0100 Message-ID: <874m10xcsi.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <20170112180655.1588-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <20170112183017.GB23706@jasmine> <87wpe05adv.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20170112200346.GA11411@jasmine> <87shonai6b.fsf@netris.org> <20170115184717.GA29718@jasmine> <87lgucxhwz.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20170115204922.GB4522@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSrqt-0000Ec-Va for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 15:56:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSrqq-0007zP-VR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 15:56:36 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:39328) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSrqq-0007zI-O7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 15:56:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170115204922.GB4522@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari writes: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 08:05:48PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Is it possible to use the 'package-input-rewriting' procedure here? See >> example at the end of section 5.1.0: >>=20 >> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/guix.html#Defining-Packages >>=20 >> Otherwise this LGTM, thanks a lot! > > Okay, please test this updated patch series :) That looks great, thanks! :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlh74f0ACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqLyAf+JX4iG7pkfIb9v6F6dPGASuibWOXvr2LnF12S/XgZwy/l45q2THgjH41x wgpfmOUQ+m3WmBrU8L0nbAT3HBXilCTLaQLnwTAnVWTKBXTlXL4SBiUL/+B5o4vg nya0jQdQtaeAlmLX5mbI+xAZyFBWhgp2c1C8wFWxhSU/GmFkBYSNv5RKGKvIh2AY Wtc3s2H+GcOPD4lyPo94AlztmgHT8dU6deaN21UKCI29IlM8iiQ27aG89fHf1sZb lTXl1uscdams5hgVnjI/Xd5/BT3VKXiL+mksBwBYqzWKr1aPTPFNKH9nzA4szoN0 UQ1645UmMicpSJodPSApc4/rplldUQ== =rmZK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--