From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Guix plugin for GNOME Software Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 16:27:39 +0200 Message-ID: <874lrf7ztw.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42681) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzkeE-0003Z1-9X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 10:27:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzkeD-0006Zc-JC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2017 10:27:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: (David Seaward's message of "Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:38:40 -0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: David Seaward Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, David Seaward skribis: > I recently mentioned Flatpak and Snap. There are GNOME Software > plugins for both of these formats [1][2] which makes them more > accessible to everyday users. > > Does issue 17152 [3] mean that a matching plugin [4] is on the > Guix roadmap? AFAIK nobody is working on a GNOME Software plugin for Guix, but I agree that it would be nice. It may not be that difficult. Ludo=E2=80=99.