From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: core-updates Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 16:47:42 +0100 Message-ID: <874lmh6in5.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87wozhjilt.fsf@elephly.net> <87lgftp088.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emiEt-0004p3-Ti for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:47:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emiEs-0004iA-Ux for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:47:55 -0500 In-reply-to: <87lgftp088.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > The weather is OK, though it=E2=80=99s surprisingly lower than what I=E2= =80=99d expect > given that everything has been built according to Hydra/Cuirass: The patch for GHC 8 is not yet part of core-updates, which will invalidate a lot of packages. We should get that commit from master and apply it to core-updates, and then start another evaluation. Have there been any big failures that could explain the low coverage? -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net