From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: staging evaluation in progress Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:15:30 +0200 Message-ID: <874lk1aiwt.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <874lkbds7e.fsf@fastmail.com> <87vacnief8.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43537) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAfzz-0003iG-Qm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:15:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAfzw-0005fK-K4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:15:35 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:46369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAfzw-0005fC-Fl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:15:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87vacnief8.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Mark H Weaver writes: > Hi Marius, > > Marius Bakke writes: > >> I just started a 'staging' evaluation: >> >> https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/staging >> >> Fairly minor changes this round, highlights include Wayland 1.15 and >> GStreamer 1.14. We narrowly missed Mesa 17.3.9 which was scheduled for >> today but delayed, hopefully 17.3.8 doesn't introduce any new bugs. >> >> Results should start ticking in tomorrow. > > The main issue I see so far is that 'gst-plugins-base' seems to > consistently fail the "elements/opus" test on i686-linux. It failed > twice in a row, anyway: > > https://hydra.gnu.org/build/2635798 I can reproduce this failure locally, and could not find related bug reports or git commits upstream. For now I downgraded to 1.12.5 so we can proceed, and will report the i686 and armhf issues upstream. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlreIsIACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPrBHgf/dTM3GbWEJPz81/xrJedJBNsrDtaCDka/4PAOmEQ6QAEAupWT2YYZJRgV gyaGdmISA5U8bXSZL00lXNM0OhgoObdEQ/UI50RTb1siUQN1hoa5H8mznjINRPX8 xPsdgbFaAYJgyE4hLLGsRtof8l/MfTK8TWmNVY1faHo7wBPObAs9UA3NFMBteuCU apZ8NzgJQssmEcafqYDNO0LZ030kAMlBYFqSGBbpNKv1pb6PFHzLCX+3mmaf3dM1 herqHWHrW9qY23wkHipgEPParpgXxLZYWL6KOgZ5d6Q6YTLXakVWmOxIZFvc2WRK flebqJB59gamxxd1NHvKTPdlywcaWQ== =yFtp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--