unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Portability should be a higher priority for Guix (was Re: 01/01: build-system/meson: Really skip the 'fix-runpath' phase on armhf.)
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:46:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874lhegjed.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k1qa192c.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Thu, 05 Jul 2018 08:38:19 +0200")

Hello,

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:

>> However, I do feel frustrated by the fact that it's considered
>> acceptable in this community to leave non-x86_64 users with broken
>> systems in the name of "moving things forward" for x86_64 users.
>
> I don’t think this is true.

What is true is that most Guix users use x86_64 primarily.  But there’s
also a lot of interest in ARM.

Guix doesn’t exist in a vacuum, and I think the situation of non-x86_64
support in Guix is just as good or bad as in other free software
projects.  We have fewer packages available on non-x86_64 architectures,
but that’s in large part due to upstream packages not supporting those
architectures in the first place.

I agree this is sad, but repeating it doesn’t help address it.

> I do agree with your laments about a lack of popularity of non-x86_64
> systems and thus developers, but I do think this has been getting better
> with the work this community has done to support Guix for the aarch64
> and armhf architectures, and by adding aarch64/armhf build servers to
> the build farm.  We can and should do more of this, but it won’t happen
> by decree.

Agreed.

> One thing that would help, in my opinion, is to purchase hardware and
> make it available to interested developers and/or join these new
> machines to the build farm.  We would need to come to an agreement about
> at least these things:
>
>   * what exact system configurations do we want?
>   * where would these systems be hosted?
>   * how many do we need / can we afford to buy and pay hosting fees for?
>
> The last time this has come up the discussion kinda tapered out.  It
> would be good if someone or a group of people would volunteer to take
> this on and drive this project to its conclusion.

I agree!  If someone cares about ARM, for instance, now’s the time to
tell us what we should buy and to offer to help out with
hosting/sysadmin.  That would be immensely helpful in maintaining
non-x86_64 up to speed.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-05  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20180702101757.22792.51026@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
     [not found] ` <20180702101758.97A6020543@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
2018-07-02 17:29   ` 01/01: build-system/meson: Really skip the 'fix-runpath' phase on armhf Mark H Weaver
2018-07-02 18:06     ` Marius Bakke
2018-07-03 19:20       ` Mark H Weaver
2018-07-04  7:21         ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-07-04 19:55           ` RFC: Portability should be a higher priority for Guix (was Re: 01/01: build-system/meson: Really skip the 'fix-runpath' phase on armhf.) Mark H Weaver
2018-07-04 22:32             ` Kei Kebreau
2018-07-05  8:39               ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-07-05 14:15                 ` Kei Kebreau
2018-07-05  9:04               ` Jonathan Brielmaier
2018-07-05 19:40                 ` Andreas Enge
2018-07-05  6:38             ` Ricardo Wurmus
2018-07-05  8:46               ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2018-07-05  9:52               ` Andreas Enge
2018-07-05  8:50             ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-07-05  9:01             ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-07-02 18:28     ` 01/01: build-system/meson: Really skip the 'fix-runpath' phase on armhf Marius Bakke
2018-07-03 19:24       ` Mark H Weaver
2018-07-04  7:27         ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-07-04 14:27           ` Marius Bakke
2018-07-03 21:28       ` Ludovic Courtès

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874lhegjed.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=rekado@elephly.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).