Ludo',

Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> I suppose we could use some specially-formatted Git commits to 
>>> pass
>>> messages to users.  I’m afraid it would be hard to get those
>>> messages
>>> translated.
>>
>> I beg you not to do this, even as fodder for a friendly front
>> end. Just use a structured text file.  Add dates.  Affected
>> packages. Metadata.  Hell, use sexps if you like.  Fix 
>> typos/add
>> caveats to old news items when needed, not through errata 
>> commits.
>> Don't confuse git log with a log like some people confuse git 
>> blame
>> with comments.
>
> The interesting part here is that commits are anchored in the 
> version
> control history.  Thus, you could easily tell whether a news 
> item is
> relevant or not.

Oh, sure.

To clarify: I'm pro storing the news items in the repository.  In 
fact I think it's a bad idea to keep it anywhere else (such as the 
Web site, but by all means generate a pretty news feed from 
guix.git on there).

I just think it should be a regular file.  Don't shove News 
metadata into the commit message.  When it makes sense, update the 
News file(s) in the same commit as the code — as is done for other 
documentation, which is what this is.

Kind regards,

T G-R