Hi! It's been a while, and now that I'm on the verge of releasing Next 1.3 and a dependency is a package-inferred-system, I thought it would be the perfect time to dig out this issue! :) So I'm trying to package cl-dbus (https://github.com/death/dbus). You'll find the recipes here: https://gitlab.com/atlas-engineer/next-guix-channel I can package it in several ways, but the result does not work for the reasons mentioned in this topic. I thought of the following trick: what about just dumping the full source into "/lib/sbcl"? Wouldn't that work? Do we really need the .fasl files? When I try to build Next with dbus packaged using this last trick, it actually gets quite far, until it complains about circular dependencies: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Unhandled ASDF/ACTION:CIRCULAR-DEPENDENCY in thread #: Circular dependency: ((# . #) (# . #) (# . #) (# . #) (# . #) (# . #) (# . #) (# . #) (# . #) (# . #) (# . #) (# . #) (# . #) (# . #)) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I've asked for help on ASDF issue tracker: https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/asdf/asdf/issues/10 By the way, there they confirmed that using `*source-registry*` is the right way to go. Note that this is _not_ the same variable as `*source-registry-parameter*` that Katherine mentioned. So we are good on that front. Thoughts? -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/