From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Collect guix profiles in single directory. Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 13:04:30 +0100 Message-ID: <874kwbq1bl.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <87blrefavb.fsf@gnu.org> <34307ca779925da741af20fa57497c8e13eae7d6.camel@student.tugraz.at> <87tv56av8o.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87wo98pwup.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <97bd40c8513d323e11e63e1083a8bf6c33940840.camel@student.tugraz.at> <87imksoy2z.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54201) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ixV2L-0007ZA-Uj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 07:04:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ixV2K-0000YP-GM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 07:04:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Prikler , zimoun Cc: Guix Devel --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > The thing with XDG_CONFIG_HOME and config-directory is, that it doesn't > allow me to set config-directory directly AND requires all other > configuration to be put in the new XDG_CONFIG_HOME as well. I > personally wouldn't mind reading all profiles from config-directory, > but I would like a way to set that to ~/.guix. Make sense, we need to define a GUIX_CONFIG_HOME that expands to XDG_CONFIG_HOME/guix by default. >> By time creation/modification? > mtime will cause weird bugs if you do single upgrades of profiles.=20 > ctime may be acceptable, depending on how familiar one is with touch, > but I'd personally prefer reverse alphabetical because it is the > easiest to understand. To be clear, I think we need to speak in terms of priority: should "a" have higher priority than "z" or the other way around? =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl40F84ACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH/Vwwf/bKBkiYsBZB0GUvQvYMAUV7bulEBP5RjOvHXVBbB1pqE/7ldLweYAPqU4 a1UryoVs17wqKiOYXavjY2PDU/qYEJ8b7vqGZw0XPs6StgPIuW7pOzBMQHukA0KQ a1jpg8Y3XQnmk8sqpnIEeKmAaqjYv+D+C+HxcvKDTc/YrAR5prmWhVD9cEVGhRJw +9xFRBRMbWVMsFQuyViLGqyEXGTTHk9z+hDxPMaQb2XmxCYyQ4Z2/DcssRSqi4+M j9lLFo34aUlDeRCJ71o4Bk9hmZkk37/okIAoTFpkZREd9dG247XbKO2VDt1tX4Ew lSYkF5N2P6XruJ8OS8glPVelGZFKmQ== =XUXp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--