From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id kAtaMt8bAGAsPQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:24:31 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id sB8yLt8bAGAaXwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:24:31 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 186AE94042E for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42374 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzznp-0000Bs-VP for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 05:24:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34338) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzznW-0000A7-9f for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 05:24:11 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:43002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzznT-0006wK-7R; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 05:24:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=cXwuOJHPCtxqMfTEl/MVoZ+npYxhdFL7bqeIP8f4uvI=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=QapoIuz7TXUOtzQr51YBkb+bftCvGEfLd+PeP DgfSJti4eYOK64b5UICD9N/2L40xes5IdPEtTPfLTXh95FYOi32pJXfWsoa++rE8rQ+7TR Yrg+uzDhbJaYyM3+6FhuvC3/WeSE54RHC7bVxFEuCCxRBiaHzfaDyJLAXZYtAGI1TjGd1r q+d8lkIIcl7KohozFMsaOeYhkJ0eQxjVHs+laSW8kROfAi1CuYOA6lfleoHoa1MKfhT44e X8v1i2I+VvXAarHWbHXgTMEP5EcoLsVws6R4cONmMYH1HvJ3DeGOxFGid7Sfl4nIQ6IP+I MBM+8OffC4boExN5suyJcCjqw== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id f7deb1d3 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:24:34 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: Staging branch [substitute availability] References: <87eein6hf6.fsf@gnu.org> In-reply-to: <87eein6hf6.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:24:03 +0100 Message-ID: <874kjjrf3w.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.66 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=QapoIuz7; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 186AE94042E X-Spam-Score: -4.66 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: OJZrbd9fE3Gh --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mathieu! Mathieu Othacehe =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Longer term, we need to figure out a better solution. It's now > obvious that we do not have the computation power to build all=20 > our > branches for 5 different architectures I don't think it's obvious and I don't think it's true. > relying heavily on emulation for armhf and aarch64. Only because we don't use the non-emulated hardware. Our=20 (currently 3, one crashed) Overdrives 1000 sit idle for ~90% of=20 the time. The situation is worse for x86_64: 96% idleness based on=20 /proc/uptime. Am I misinterpreting? Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYAAbww0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15oSkBAKBPRNPATN0KvMeGGdmtFXvWlP7nwVcBYEotDola bjV1AQCUZtsG6ZpHAdUgaZHQ/jMiAHdBcncG2ucyPwG8I699Aw== =9a/U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--