From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 0IWnNM/hLmBJIwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:53:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id WAhvMM/hLmBHQQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:53:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44B9D1482F for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 22:53:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59058 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCrEc-0003gW-Fq for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:53:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39040) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCrEQ-0003eh-20; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:53:06 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50687) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCrEN-000547-T0; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:53:03 -0500 Received: from [2001:980:1b4f:1:42d2:832d:bb59:862] (port=55856 helo=dundal.janneke.lilypond.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lCrEM-0001va-S9; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:53:03 -0500 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen To: Vagrant Cascadian To: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: Update on wip-arm-bootstrap Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl References: <87blco9v58.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7m91d3j.fsf@yucca> X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 22:52:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h7m91d3j.fsf@yucca> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Thu, 18 Feb 2021 09:48:32 -0800") Message-ID: <874ki9cabq.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, bug-mes@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.47 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 44B9D1482F X-Spam-Score: -1.47 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: wrhAq57GSjlp Vagrant Cascadian writes: Hi! > On 2021-02-13, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: [..] >> ...pretty familiar. So, what's going on here? Do the "woody" >> binaries not run on novena? > > My guess would be OABI (debian "arm" architecture) vs. EABI (debian > "armel" or "armhf" architectures). The hardware may likly support OABI, > but the kernel may need a compatibility layer enabled. > > https://wiki.debian.org/ArmPorts Ah, interesting. The kernel config has # CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT is not set ...certainly a lot easier to find when you know what you're looking for. @Danny: I'm wondering if we could (should?) try a kernel with OABI compatibility? I suppose it would be better to somehow target EABI...but I'm not sure that's possible with glibc-2.2.5 / gcc-2.95.3. Interesting choices here! Greetings, Janneke --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com