From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: utils: Improve docstrings.
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:20:13 +0100
Message-ID: <873896w9eq.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87bnnv80le.fsf@taylan.uni.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48070)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1XtZhz-0004gP-Ty
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 05:20:37 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1XtZhp-0003Br-2c
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 05:20:27 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:40571)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1XtZho-0003BY-Rt
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 05:20:17 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87bnnv80le.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> ("\"Taylan Ulrich
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=5C\=22Bay\=C4\=B1rl\=C4\=B1\=2FKammer\=5C\=22\=5C\=22\=22's\?\=
	message of "Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:52:13 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: taylanbayirli@gmail.com
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

taylanbayirli@gmail.com ("Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer\"") skrib=
is:

> The behavior could be changed, but it seems like it was explicitly
> programmed to work this way, and does make sense in a way, so I
> decided to add a warning about this into the docstrings of
> `substitute' and `substitute*'.

Makes sense.  I=E2=80=99ve applied to patch to =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=
=99, since it=E2=80=99s a
full-rebuild change.

Thanks!

Ludo=E2=80=99.