From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paul van der Walt <paul@denknerd.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ghc-cpphs.
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 13:20:40 +0200
Message-ID: <8737x3rvxz.fsf@denknerd.org>
References: <1445483479-19104-1-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
	<1445484334-25558-1-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
	<1445484334-25558-3-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37358)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paul@denknerd.org>) id 1ZpDvO-0003He-1b
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:20:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paul@denknerd.org>) id 1ZpDvK-000370-1T
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:20:50 -0400
Received: from mx01.mykolab.com ([95.128.36.1]:10498 helo=mx-out01.mykolab.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paul@denknerd.org>) id 1ZpDvJ-00036v-Q6
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:20:45 -0400
In-reply-to: <1445484334-25558-3-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: ericbavier@openmailbox.org
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hi Eric,

On 2015-10-22 at 05:25, quoth ericbavier@openmailbox.org:
>> +    (name "ghc-cpphs")
>
> We should probably name this package "cpphs".

Indeed.  I've also renamed ghc-hlint to hlint.

>> +    (license lgpl2.1)))
>
> It looks to me as if the library portions are under the lgpl2.1+ (the '+'
> because they specify no version), and the executable 'cpphs' is under the
> gpl3+ (again, because no version is specified in the source), so both licenses
> should be listed.

Fixed.