From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: pcmanfm version update
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 22:10:36 +0200
Message-ID: <8737qu8rwj.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <a4d252f75b60f2ac8c2d414ef6c1b20c@openmailbox.org>
	<b5b0b8a1b4c6e6dc5cde52ea7a8c9d8f@openmailbox.org>
	<87shyvrww4.fsf@gmail.com>
	<71ca60a5ce463ec85842355bdf5d86c6@openmailbox.org>
	<87bn5i4u2u.fsf@gmail.com> <20160409171958.GA25062@solar>
	<20160409195903.GC7587@debian-netbook>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59444)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@gnu.org>) id 1aozDP-0007ry-D1
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 16:10:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@gnu.org>) id 1aozDL-0001yL-Bg
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 16:10:42 -0400
Received: from v-zimmta02.u-bordeaux.fr ([147.210.215.20]:45338)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mthl@gnu.org>)
	id 1aozDL-0001y4-43
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 16:10:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160409195903.GC7587@debian-netbook> (Efraim Flashner's message
	of "Sat, 9 Apr 2016 22:59:03 +0300")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>, rain1@openmailbox.org

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:19:58PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:37:13PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
>> > But these are 2 different packages from 2 different sources, so I still
>> > think it makes sense to update them in 2 commits.  I hope other people
>> > tell what is preferable here on their opinions, thanks.
>> 
>> Yes, we always work on one package at a time.
>> 
>> Andreas
>> 
>
> We do have some packages that have to be updated together, acme and
> letsencrypt, python-cryptography and python-cryptography-vectors. But
> those do have a commit message that they are updated together.
>
> Does either libfm or pcmanfm build independant of the other being
> upgraded?

They are independent.

-- 
Mathieu Lirzin