From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Gs Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 01:01:41 +0200 Message-ID: <8737n1e0q2.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20160722220501.GA6445@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44201) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQjST-0005c3-VH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 19:02:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQjS7-0007Bq-Qk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 19:02:17 -0400 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:24076) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQjS7-0007Ba-HY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 19:01:55 -0400 In-reply-to: <20160722220501.GA6445@solar> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge writes: > Hello, > > the following commit > commit eb354bdacbf4154ec66038dac07f19bf4ced1fad > Author: Ludovic Courtès > Date: Mon May 9 15:54:34 2016 +0200 > > gnu: ghostscript: Do not build the statically-linked 'gs' binary. > > * gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm (ghostscript)[arguments]: Remove > 'build-so' and 'install-so' phases. Replace 'build' and 'install' > phases. > > removes "gs" from the ghostscript package. However, this is the usual program > that people expect. For instance, unison uses it for building its > documentation. Is there a dynamically linked binary which replaces gs? > If yes, should we add a symbolic link? This also broke our “lilypond” package on core-updates. ~~ Ricardo