From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add dlib.
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:52:37 +0100
Message-ID: <8737m1yqru.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
References: <20160815201528.GA23963@jasmine>
	<87a8gd22ug.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20160815222840.GA10735@jasmine>
	<4752bc68-5466-6c26-a7b4-e53aec400ff5@uq.edu.au>
	<8760r10z7n.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20160816204736.GA25753@jasmine>
	<993034f9-ceae-525f-01b9-0b8af7a5aafe@uq.edu.au>
	<20160816234507.GA24224@jasmine>
	<d29f34fd-d2b6-26a3-3c3a-1ac35ef59e56@uq.edu.au>
	<87h9ajzc1z.fsf@ike.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20160818202353.GB2393@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57520)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1bahPz-0008Sh-BC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 06:52:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1bahPv-0005Nc-4j
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 06:52:54 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:42283)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1bahPs-0005Mg-KH
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 06:52:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160818202353.GB2393@jasmine>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> I pushed the patch as 5f0ff6a9e. Hopefully dlib is still useful without
> lapack. We should really figure out what the issue is and fix it :)

I noticed this fails to build on Hydra. What's worse is that the i686,
x86_64 and armhf targets fails at completely different things. armhf and
i686 exits cleanly after failing 2 and 5 tests respectively, while the
x86_64 target seems to get the segfault we saw with lapack in inputs.

What should we do? I'd prefer to keep the package so it can easily be
tested on various architectures, but can understand if it is reverted.
Perhaps we can disable substitutes or tests, to stop bothering Hydra?

I'll try reproducing it this weekend on various qemu configurations.