From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: libreoffice: Add 'libreoffice' symlink. Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 21:54:33 +0300 Message-ID: <8737i0ubva.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20161205122551.12427-1-ng0@libertad.pw> <20161205122551.12427-2-ng0@libertad.pw> <58456029.4010102@crazy-compilers.com> <8760mycvgd.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <58469617.3060207@crazy-compilers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEKtv-0003mj-EX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:55:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEKts-0006HE-1A for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:55:39 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:33533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEKtr-0006Gw-K7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:55:35 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id u144so23222475wmu.0 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 10:55:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <58469617.3060207@crazy-compilers.com> (Hartmut Goebel's message of "Tue, 6 Dec 2016 11:42:31 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Hartmut Goebel Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hartmut Goebel (2016-12-06 11:42 +0100) wrote: > Am 05.12.2016 um 15:16 schrieb ng0: >> Okay, I have no preference for the symlink type or how it's >> done. >> Feel free to co-author your bits, there's no way I'm building >> libreoffice for the 8th time in 3 days for this minor change. > > Fair point :-) If I'm the only one asking for relative sym-links, please > ignore my comment. I would also prefer a relative symlink (but I'm not going to build libreoffice :-)) -- Alex