From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] gnu: Add python-argparse. Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:48:54 +0300 Message-ID: <8737ghbjzd.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20170117141141.11694-1-rekado@elephly.net> <20170117141141.11694-2-rekado@elephly.net> <587E2EF6.6000106@crazy-compilers.com> <874m0x908a.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTYoW-0003XF-Uv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:49:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTYoT-0003lR-Tc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:49:01 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-x242.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::242]:32818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cTYoT-0003km-La for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:48:57 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id x1so12132853lff.0 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:48:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <874m0x908a.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:26:13 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ricardo Wurmus (2017-01-17 16:26 +0100) wrote: > Hartmut Goebel writes: > >> Am 17.01.2017 um 15:11 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: >>> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-argparse, python2-argparse): New >> >> As of Python >=3D 2.7 and >=3D 3.2, the argparse module is maintained wi= thin >> the Python standard library. Why do we need a this package? > > Turns out we don=E2=80=99t! It used to be required by ribodiff, but that= builds > fine without it (and my patch doesn=E2=80=99t include it). > > So this should indeed be dropped. Oops, then ignore my previous message about indentation :-) --=20 Alex