From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update haunt to 0.2.1
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 19:03:54 +0100
Message-ID: <8737g7vwxh.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAJ98PDxoj0e-wRBoo++pmn=ds0XOV9Nodv+si_vRxfDei44dYw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87a8ag3y58.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAJ=Rwfa3E-LESg7pR0vKPK7i5DaN7v5PXOYbui-rxp=_ASOctQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50952)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cWRvL-0007sb-Vf
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:04:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cWRvI-0005CN-SV
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:04:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAJ=Rwfa3E-LESg7pR0vKPK7i5DaN7v5PXOYbui-rxp=_ASOctQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(David Thompson's message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:03:05 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: "Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Howdy David!

"Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu> skribis:

> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrot=
e:
>> Catonano <catonano@gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> From 015719506600bcb674b1d47398af27c2b4f32d18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: humanitiesNerd <catonano@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:55:12 +0100
>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: haunt: Update to 0.2.1
>>>
>>> * gnu/packages/guile.scm (haunt): Update to 0.2.1.
>>
>> Applied, thanks.  :-)
>>
>>>      (propagated-inputs
>>> -     `(("guile-reader" ,guile-reader)))
>>> +     `(("guile-reader" ,guile-reader)
>>> +       ("guile-commonmark" ,guile-commonmark)))
>>
>> We could (should?) avoid this by augmenting the =E2=80=98wrap-haunt=E2=
=80=99 phase.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Agreed, but even better would be if I knew how to make upstream just
> do the right thing to begin with. ;)  Do you know how this could be
> done?

For Haunt=E2=80=99s own modules, you could set the right search path in the
=E2=80=98haunt=E2=80=99 command itself, like the Shepherd and Guix do.

For these external dependencies, you could always use =E2=80=98search-path=
=E2=80=99 at
configure time to hard-wire their locations in =E2=80=98haunt=E2=80=99 as w=
ell.  (Guix
does not do that and I don=E2=80=99t know of any project that does, but IWB=
N.)

Ludo=E2=80=99.