From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: The broken 0.13 release for GuixSD Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:32:33 +0200 Message-ID: <8737bua3se.fsf@elephly.net> References: <874lwaa6ud.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50603) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDUWz-0005Dr-KC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 07:32:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDUWu-0005Xx-LV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 07:32:45 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21015) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDUWu-0005Rv-Dw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 07:32:40 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0@pragmatique.xyz Cc: guix-devel >> Please, the least you could do when using words like “broken” and >> “should not happen at all” is to be precise about *what* fails. […] > This https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27034 and > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27032 this. Then it’s better to add additional information to these bug reports instead of diluting the discussion by starting a new thread on guix-devel. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net