From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: Audio/sound (ALSA) in guix environment --container
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 12:05:40 +0100
Message-ID: <8736n8pofv.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
References: <874l7wgg75.fsf@bababa.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<878sx1h817.fsf@gnu.org> <87bm1x4kmb.fsf@elephly.net>
	<87d0mcpqy7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <8736n84n74.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52797)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1h96NO-0002Dk-Eu
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 07:05:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1h96NN-0004TZ-8e
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 07:05:46 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8736n84n74.fsf@elephly.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> I suppose /etc/pam.d/ also needs to be in the container.

Tried it, same error.

>> What about defaulting to 1000?  It's rather common, so I guess that
>> would be anonymous enough and "just work".
>
> Would it make sense to map the current user=E2=80=99s UID into the contai=
ner
> instead of using a fixed UID?

We have a "--user" option, so we could use the current user's UID when
=2D-user is not specified, 1000 otherwise.
Or better: add a --uid CLI option.

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAlybWQQACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH+S0wf/W1LN74WptOpVtAY5vFHW7TJIXS6JIr1yVZHAdBPH936qG/HYfgFM14dF
ha99WD9OexRy2WKqkAA5oOrb9IZBU0IGc8PaEMnjdPSiofEmke7Dq5CbFp5u8zz6
HQuhy+2qyssYTm3detPGTRG9Jdql2xJkEjNnSWtTwuOrRptkRe1WQxeN4nYWnNGQ
FkHTUrxxlb2FgQP9Qj5FLoHAj0V0IQw7+qks3DkP0Qhuh7ijV4RBnTEQUS7OeRQ4
Aw4fb+bes9R18saj2zUVOd6SYhdY8IBMQ8rXFX6sg6Olglhw6e83wV9WN87QJ9wT
weIF1tBZwlWUDzCCUQDkIyipVBUh/A==
=Q/+0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--