From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Subject: Re: [core-updates] Due to flawed bootstrap tarball, full rebuild needed Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 19:16:35 +0200 Message-ID: <8736izxq8c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sgqz9z7v.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46724) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hpFRz-0006WR-Bn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 13:16:44 -0400 List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Mark H Weaver writes: > It turns out that the MesCC bootstrap tarball includes store references, > and moreover it references a different store item than the MesCC > bootstrap tarball that I built locally on my own machine. See > for details and a proposed > patch from Janneke to fix the problem. > > In my opinion, we should update the bootstrap binaries and rebuild > 'core-updates' from scratch. What do other people think? Yes, I second that. I have just successfully built `hello' again with the new set of tarballs; IWBN if you could verify the new, stripped set. janneke --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com