From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 6J5mA9kHoF8nJAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 13:21:29 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 44ffOtgHoF+2ZwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 13:21:28 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 922BB940222 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43098 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZZm3-0002Ab-BM for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 08:21:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZZlY-00029U-J9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 08:20:58 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]:37185) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kZZlS-0007iH-R8; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 08:20:55 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id c16so9471961wmd.2; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 05:20:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=lq9H2Nz8cAjacrjBHMhNLoHsLXLM195NhUJs6/cgQMA=; b=bXl/TkwGZYSAFzYPhkvgxid6dyQhgLguEmVauUIrbVzmk+bLeWMI3xFSbBJxNAK87s 5fhNeYYIk+27WqBJEZavAyvgRJS/F+vGygN+SzkcoUiFVuLF3U5POku4v4YbtLmW6J9q fZXo0bNLQX08+v1Odci76NnZrnOL1ATmK4SjYa9w5YJ4s8C8WfYycxl30FH7fqBpA/A6 VNMbLIJ9Ns/mECCT/b3C8P30B0DksTATzexJSjnXM2ygimKUrHOCvyxPJJdFckedNnG1 gPC5WFQutTO5HtRdot1cbv28JREPdDLQ4dL8/2jj2MccI0kDCGjCzmoUbPLNyWG+SJg1 RA8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=lq9H2Nz8cAjacrjBHMhNLoHsLXLM195NhUJs6/cgQMA=; b=AJaPH7Eoq8rQVQLI0iTHk45CDHuXukLlg3HeP2e0He2ygRf9/V69XTUNgESp93iImS /UGzbYSzzQJLs7xv6ApBMDgcFmLCBmbK/EcSLKYQrtG7DTvRAjWDCto92+z91XJdguFs mT3A/0x5csLUyVdZgs5aEQAUZJBmyi+UQNtHYHXreDkrvnryVkrWVUvQaAwp8OYMcvBf s6o+Nvr2x9zaqt7iVTHpdHgo/+FYNz3flJUNnIVRoNLb4mbk4YZ1lhWfeSZPEbs84QyI lh5S6VRplvKccPp3epCYFh6rJUj0GcRkqTBboBlxcBWmXeX3TJslhmjmyo88kpxt1GUO Z6FQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wqjwAdbZ8M6WegBMjEaJRTFrMpVS8qHq5bFMVJuSt5yjsHUHn Rhh5kSVZ9E0vWsah1WyytzqV5vwEjq88pDix X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzn7Ox78pj39igPvRTUHidure9DMrIwpIGXlqNuzPtPre/nMrtGQliTaJqNjfY8qzVhFi3cNw== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c453:: with SMTP id l19mr6579488wmi.2.1604323245499; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 05:20:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from unfall (218.139.134.37.dynamic.jazztel.es. [37.134.139.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u202sm15945112wmu.23.2020.11.02.05.20.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Nov 2020 05:20:44 -0800 (PST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Miguel_=C3=81ngel_Arruga_Vivas?= To: zimoun , "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" , Julien Lepiller Subject: Re: Branching for v1.2? References: <863630u6ap.fsf@gmail.com> <87zh4f4ukl.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnzj1shv.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0v7yv4l.fsf@gmail.com> <87zh42qbco.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 14:20:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Mon, 2 Nov 2020 09:43:49 +0100") Message-ID: <87361r3nfh.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32a; envelope-from=rosen644835@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32a.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jakub =?utf-8?B?S8SF?= =?utf-8?B?ZHppb8WCa2E=?= , Guix Devel , Maxim Cournoyer , Mathieu Othacehe Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bXl/TkwG; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.49 X-TUID: VuEoUL/wY0AF --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi simon, zimoun writes: > Hi, > > On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 at 23:28, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >> Having pushed the (guix transformations) patch=C2=B9, which also updates= the >> manual and thus requires yet some more translation work, I think I don= =E2=80=99t >> have any serious changes to make and I=E2=80=99d be happy to branch now.= WDYT? > > I think it would be good to branch. > > >> There are a couple of pending issues, notably regarding locales in GRUB, >> but nothing big hopefully, and nothing that changes the manual and >> strings I believe. > > Does it break the system? > Miguel seems to say no. Only Ludo knows about which exact issues was thinking, I can speak only for myself. :-) Messages displayed by GRUB should be localized as declared on the operating-system with current master; menu items aren't translated yet because I have to work more on that implementation and I couldn't reach this release with something good, sorry. :-( > Does it downgrade the first impression that the user has? As far as my testing goes, all the bits that could lead to that are already solved on master too. >> Tuesday 6th is approaching very fast and probably we=E2=80=99re be a bit= behind >> schedule, we=E2=80=99ll see. > > I think this Fri. Nov. 6th will be hard; but it is still doable if we > branch really soon. Tomorrow? With my translator hat on: a new tarball for TP has to be generated before or after creating the branch (1.2.0-pre3). If done tomorrow, I think the translations could need a bit later than Friday to catch up; Florian and Julien, what do you think? Happy hacking! Miguel --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEEiIeExBRZrMuD5+hMY0xuiXn6vsIFAl+gB6IACgkQY0xuiXn6 vsIvGgv9Fm7NWgaA9BHHSUt4aokKd7TcCSdjanXvzr+3LlC5XQOHHAPyKpkU1ujX JsO63dHHymhRktHlnnfqxE29KkhCIgS+oaNxwt38ILlrMrOAFAd9VXas8TWXDgMS kXq2pbgpALQbRYFSiqpUUGDNhHdgAlICzjkoBo30v7eMNr8LN803vtToaJ5NdJpT 3xvqklBHgYDV2H7peVlXqCmkrgnIgsXHDeoKo7C954tDpDKYJsAEAWa9HYsxJGiS snHiyVQ5IKVyrndB9xhrbMd4Lat3xxAM9yTCkpx8Vmc7tKUNzpwBv9SB+N8wnhHK UdwTl+xlOkXIgJGx6xexJJmDMIicVOfRrA4f4MEIfSqXEtwmEm03qYCvhCmkxO70 SfWp2JL4whQspts4pHiIoUJcURcAcrsX69c1nPL6rUqU3Mv32dD/8G9lEgVs0tZ9 5McEL6A32HCl72WzejwNswuoT6L3KdOC4e1wjyoUwM+owefH8UMDk+VERkh8p2it HYG2XCMC =0nDj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--