From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
To: "Léo Le Bouter" <lle-bout@zaclys.net>,
"Leo Famulari" <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>,
Raghav Gururajan <rg@raghavgururajan.name>,
Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at>,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>,
Sou Bunnbu <iyzsong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 03:46:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8735vgkttf.fsf@netris.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df4a659ea2f6d0c3bea2d9839927631687d8ffd0.camel@zaclys.net>
Hi Léo,
Léo Le Bouter <lle-bout@zaclys.net> writes:
> On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 15:18 -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> Léo and Raghav, you need to keep learning our workflow around
>> security updates. It's not okay to remove security patches and later
>> update a package to a fixed version in a different commit. `git
>> rebase` is the tool to learn for cases like this one.
>
> I knew about this but I didnt feel like telling Raghav to do yet
> another rebase. I felt like Raghav was taking on with so much already.
This response is what native English speakers call a "red herring"
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring>: something that misleads or
distracts from a relevant or important question.
Why do I say that? As I pointed out elsewhere in this thread,
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2021-04/msg00366.html
it appears that Raghav didn't actually remove the security fixes; it
appears that *you* did. Therefore, I fail to see how it could have been
avoided by asking Raghav to do another rebase.
From the IRC logs cited in the message above, it appears that you took
the liberty of modifying Raghav's "cosmetic changes" commits to also
remove security fixes in the re-indented packages, while claiming in the
summary lines that you were "ungraft[ing]" cairo and glib.
https://git.sr.ht/~lle-bout/guix/commit/a045a48dd961f0c5c3d536dcc3fd21d9c08d2d50
https://git.sr.ht/~lle-bout/guix/commit/6477daa338fbf1c9edacfc3690aca77cacfe0008
Can you please explain what went wrong here?
Thanks,
Mark
--
Support Richard Stallman against the vicious disinformation campaign
against him and the FSF. See <https://stallmansupport.org> for more.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-24 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-22 0:58 A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-22 2:41 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-22 3:17 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-22 4:05 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-22 4:33 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-22 5:02 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-22 17:21 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-22 17:40 ` Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes) Mark H Weaver
2021-04-22 20:06 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-22 21:24 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-04-22 21:33 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-26 17:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-04-28 16:43 ` Criticisms of my "tone" " Mark H Weaver
2021-04-28 17:55 ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-28 20:24 ` Pjotr Prins
2021-04-29 6:54 ` Joshua Branson
2021-04-29 9:26 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-29 15:30 ` Matias Jose Seco Baccanelli
2021-04-30 0:57 ` aviva
2021-05-01 17:02 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2021-05-01 20:07 ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-01 22:12 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-01 22:54 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-01 23:15 ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-02 3:13 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-02 10:31 ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-03 9:00 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-03 9:59 ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-03 17:00 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-02 4:17 ` 宋文武
2021-05-02 4:31 ` Leo Famulari
2021-05-02 6:26 ` 宋文武
2021-05-02 15:01 ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-02 19:29 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-02 20:09 ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-02 21:02 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-02 21:58 ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-02 20:59 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-05-02 21:23 ` Mark H Weaver
[not found] ` <87czu9sr9k.fsf@outlook.com>
2021-05-02 4:33 ` 宋文武
2021-04-22 21:51 ` Another misleading commit log " Ludovic Courtès
2021-04-22 21:49 ` A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-24 8:09 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-30 0:58 ` aviva
2021-04-22 18:37 ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-22 18:48 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-22 21:50 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-22 4:08 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-22 11:39 ` 宋文武
2021-04-22 13:28 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-22 20:01 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-22 21:08 ` Christopher Baines
2021-04-22 21:09 ` Leo Prikler
2021-04-22 21:21 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-23 17:52 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2021-04-23 18:00 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-23 18:38 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2021-04-23 22:06 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-23 18:50 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-23 19:15 ` Leo Prikler
2021-04-23 19:18 ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-23 19:33 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-23 20:12 ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-26 17:06 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2021-04-26 17:32 ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-26 21:56 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2021-04-26 23:01 ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-24 7:46 ` Mark H Weaver [this message]
2021-04-26 14:59 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-26 15:23 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2021-04-26 17:21 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-04-26 20:07 ` Pjotr Prins
2021-04-26 17:46 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-28 15:52 ` Marius Bakke
2021-04-29 9:13 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-29 11:46 ` Leo Prikler
2021-04-29 11:57 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-29 11:41 ` Arun Isaac
2021-04-29 12:44 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2021-04-29 14:14 ` Pjotr Prins
2021-04-30 17:40 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2021-04-30 19:56 ` Pjotr Prins
2021-05-01 7:23 ` Arun Isaac
2021-05-01 12:40 ` Pjotr Prins
2021-05-01 9:15 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2021-05-01 10:18 ` Yasuaki Kudo
2021-05-03 7:18 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2021-05-01 14:50 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2021-05-03 7:25 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2021-05-04 2:18 ` Bengt Richter
2021-05-04 6:55 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2021-05-04 15:43 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-05-06 17:18 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2021-04-29 16:21 ` Arun Isaac
2021-04-26 19:31 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-27 18:10 ` Andreas Enge
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-04-21 21:11 Mark H Weaver
2021-04-21 21:24 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-21 22:22 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2021-04-21 23:45 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-21 22:16 ` Leo Prikler
2021-04-21 22:52 ` Leo Famulari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8735vgkttf.fsf@netris.org \
--to=mhw@netris.org \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=iyzsong@gmail.com \
--cc=leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at \
--cc=leo@famulari.name \
--cc=lle-bout@zaclys.net \
--cc=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
--cc=rg@raghavgururajan.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).