From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4OnhOrraY2NUhAAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 16:14:03 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id QPHyOrraY2N2ZwEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 16:14:02 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BB6C1C03D for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 16:14:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqbuI-0007dN-Ly; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 11:13:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqbuH-0007cc-9C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 11:13:25 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqbuG-00079G-3g; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 11:13:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:To: From; bh=dDuaW5X+0T+vBDrvMIRyM4liNxypsrE2WEoZeQ7rX74=; b=jfCIdT9p+RWTIVkuu1hB oseXVbHciO5w4ECuDI6N4Zy4gTfpF2LWWY3i2AC9BEYVmiKNNki1Pd8ywh8tagEVoAgFl+z2aa4Vt /efGANJvueHaWDm5hBFVLfyneebb+OnQ3tpMc0BJ5EWCr6iNDLS7e5Yhr+ut2MBZuQX4Oog2VG7wo NzZp+lY/1c0kJG0J0tMViUrnKH5bo1wOoiZKvtn+EXg3Iz7XvoWexn5NHwxyIMIMA/qnHoRqz9+/E XAl9eQHXIV1Mf5JB3l6qcIn/4d64GdYTexV19Pp87uKjib9UK+q+s7nhKmnXvDkksjnSye16bEH+u fxT2e9S0hI+d+Q==; Received: from 91-160-117-201.subs.proxad.net ([91.160.117.201] helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqbuF-0005jV-Me; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 11:13:23 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Vagrant Cascadian Cc: Guix-devel Subject: Re: Release progress, week 3 References: <87zgdhzj1c.fsf@inria.fr> <87k04lci5u.fsf@contorta> <87pme5vclx.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8nxcj86.fsf@contorta> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: Tridi 13 Brumaire an 231 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volu?= =?utf-8?Q?tion=2C?= jour du Topinambour X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2022 16:13:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87v8nxcj86.fsf@contorta> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Wed, 02 Nov 2022 11:19:21 -0700") Message-ID: <8735b0qdf1.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Guix-devel" Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1667488442; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=dDuaW5X+0T+vBDrvMIRyM4liNxypsrE2WEoZeQ7rX74=; b=gZvD+jzt4QQJNyD+rmtHqgP+6GyDJgC3HQQ3YnixQfpUhMPrY/ekt7kG7MPD7Ez2k0PudF O8k5unUaPCD+RSrZmr/Xi7eiDz4F1uLfadX8kzjHcHJrvqhLusNmmIWP+YkDjbC+OC6883 dt97ocWnQfPuvRmTlsBJutc9EtAirCqIOtgYL/lxAg7jkh2eXljb56T4EXbkuOXHKri3Id +sI1EkIRa3FCOx0zT1A7VnGIrEg31SJ9txSubEBcK87cKucoy5Pv81PAaDiVXA7KRTQjvL p994QnqWetKme1cxkrJ6wQCVrkUpxDa+xIAB9gcKCDWsQoEPgYYnlwYN444qVQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1667488442; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=P6hGKHF219VzPLywx4IU8NcQbvw8DoJEJq3NbxY575wfXX4eVLE14tJoSQNZR8A4uHcAJm ghiUmPjRqVkrEzgqMYZwNUlvBMGZOoSmIZ4ChuJR+RCdKfnRXCSrPQztRGegWwKzEoke/V t18UdMzo2QVTJGgg23CoteQ4wMgUx1Rv376yL2vPgiAugjOHiyyIacV2w7Ek0XpHhMtTIO UYT1bIm2oQPSU1wvZGx66S2xWeCPwtFRqNHPtYnc84q6Hy6mtjZst9VBO5qDGuctjVidnw EwBq5UwRK1+Uh0riYAHI7nLi0Pjzu2RyOBWJkoAeVFg95q0JqEgWYd16yvhZ6A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=jfCIdT9p; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.19 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=jfCIdT9p; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6BB6C1C03D X-Spam-Score: -5.19 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: pEHwDrKPUnp7 Hi, Vagrant Cascadian skribis: >>> test-name: channel-news, no news >>> ... >>> actual-error: >>> + (git-error >>> + #< code: -1 message: "invalid version 0 on git_proxy_opt= ions" class: 3>) >>> result: FAIL >> >> This looks like an ABI issue with libgit2. Are you sure the same >> version of libgit2 is used on all these platforms? > > My quick and rough archeaology shows that libgit2-dev > 1.1.0+dfsg.1-4.1+b1 was used to build guile-git 0.5.2-4, but the current > libgit2-dev package in Debian is 1.5.0+ds-6 ... so that seems plausible. [...] > Maybe there is a better way I can track the various guile-* packages in > Debian, but manually tracking all the relevent dependents seems > implausible (or at least, a lot of work)... which may lead to the > conclusion that maintaining Guix in Debian implausible. :/ I don=E2=80=99t see how that=E2=80=99s specific to guile-* packages though.= Anytime a dependency is upgraded that introduces a different ABI, you need to rebuild dependents, right? That=E2=80=99s what=E2=80=99s happening here. > Seems like the most likely ones I would have to keep a close eye on are > guile-gcrypt, guile-git, guile-gnutls (although currently part of gnutls > this will likely change soonish), guile-lzlib, guile-ssh, guile-sqlite3, > guile-zlib, guile-zstd. And there's also keeping an eye on guile itself, > which adds another set of packages. Wheee. Hrm. Heh. Speaking of which, guile-gnutls is now a thing of its own, separate from GnuTLS: https://gitlab.com/gnutls/guile/ I believe Andreas Metzler already update Debian=E2=80=99s guile-gnutls pack= age accordingly. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.