Christopher Baines skribis: > guix-commits@gnu.org writes: > >> glv pushed a commit to branch master >> in repository guix. >> >> commit b019b49c74e51e42230da471f39bff9f642fbc24 >> Author: Guillaume Le Vaillant >> AuthorDate: Fri Jun 2 13:32:55 2023 +0200 >> >> gnu: sbcl: Update to 2.3.5. >> >> * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (sbcl): Update to 2.3.5. >> --- >> gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Did this change need to go straight to master? > > → guix refresh -l sbcl > Building the following 314 packages would ensure 1615 dependent packages are rebuilt: ... > > Above 300 but below 1800 means staging according to [1]. > > 1: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Submitting-Patches.html#index-rebuild-scheduling-strategy Currently there is no staging branch, as it got deleted because of the changes in the branching strategy ([1]). If someone creates a staging branch, will cuirass see that and start building it? Or could it just stay in limbo for months? Concerning the specific case of sbcl dependents, they build pretty fast. On my machine, building all of them took less than one hour. So the period during which some substitutes are missing is pretty short. [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63459