From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:700:3204::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id KEZVHhDte2XqdAEAkFu2QA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 07:07:12 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id oIbiGRDte2WMmQAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 07:07:12 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=r3ZaXtFu; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1702620432; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=N/BBq2+wSfAdsFQkZJKDlPJiZkR9ZdQyKzk0r+b6l0I=; b=G6ZbwCR48bqrJlHwQ7cgF2rvREg9F0uPItv/JIQITbgojaFecdW/DeI0Kg6LOj0wXsTVOb HuiWWa6aMMtOC0nFDg2EktvQocwouOWBFtHLmRm2ktSbQhtM/fa9KOGWqCRSx9Lq0DsClJ 3U5uostVVkuapUsCUibO2UCWhz8mnaoPefSPvPKEVJ+297J8NQNq4DFD6t9kvz43WdwkIg WRCZbMi3Zrv7kP9WeACFpdj1XpAK4LTzg0+9d8U7fpgdpTLs8rPLJsNfsepYBroLNMl+Oq liYWI0bptW+bZtGxh7ln/wfkZrtyZ+wHo5ECQp07fhOflRoQI/VnjzNcPucoNw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1702620432; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=HE/2mxfxfdBuSqAGXyf3ADMTFG4hggWwzCLW4m+1ilUg/5aBQbEvDtWsRj4dDYS3+aTuv5 E04RLZWKy4WphSEQYQhh5Hfk6SaMlGXJK6rcSiVET+R3g2JX2Fb1gXtKynNhCnzR09ydgy XHDMG6dtXT41VpJiJJFh6cAb3SeNl8uLbSlctLg64pA06UnhVuoECF5yQ3083dAl9+z54L MCzmColvwTRAQzxycJhR1pXJJAjtjOHS5bMqraLIdq2tO1V8VneiYog5VekSMlA+1MLQ3a UN2VMNbdHTwUFDznhbnzTn8N/QVKjATFhQhUIk4Mh/jMtulQUJh2LYAzdS3mJA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail3 header.b=r3ZaXtFu; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=protonmail.com Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 390C4556BD for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 07:07:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rE1LR-0007bl-GT; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 01:06:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rE1LP-0007bW-NQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 01:06:43 -0500 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.22]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rE1LO-0002kO-8Y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 01:06:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1702620393; x=1702879593; bh=N/BBq2+wSfAdsFQkZJKDlPJiZkR9ZdQyKzk0r+b6l0I=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=r3ZaXtFuDPofQuDfI8fGCueR2hwy438IffAgjPOMYaJYnYOrz6Uqt2gdAXguNDtMh q8egbkGHaWGl3nuiqYx+jimKTp/LtPW67zXfBX9bl7/9/y6/T20u0KP70bkXPxr9wg 3NNtolcgrw+C7guoajUv6sZKNy4fWouTpBC4K7LXYi+sS0ScGcgA4XG97LIJ5eTniO 7s5hHbjhzlPINQ9q1VGQnbwFpZ4vOesnW5PEJq9H/blM+SpDnDEYUJ0CegCBTYpWUT gZhAZzcuwMmVTM6vVIGqofHHiVzkfpgH6klU+O7hp6rBrS2flKlZsnFTeI2L6mcczR e66moaX90U2kw== Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 06:06:26 +0000 To: Leo Famulari From: John Kehayias Cc: Maxim Cournoyer , 67790-done@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#67790: New signing key Message-ID: <8734w4rode.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5d8ccd1c-b489-4304-ab1e-653a34e34be9@app.fastmail.com> References: <87plzbbcm7.fsf@gmail.com> <87a5qfbbh2.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87bkatscba.fsf@protonmail.com> <5d8ccd1c-b489-4304-ab1e-653a34e34be9@app.fastmail.com> Feedback-ID: 7805494:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.22; envelope-from=john.kehayias@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4322.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.39 X-Spam-Score: -4.39 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 390C4556BD X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: rnMcKeX1qgGY On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:16 AM, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, at 22:17, John Kehayias wrote: >> And I assume all this was just to use a new key (did I see some >> mention of subkeys on #guix? that's what I use) and not because of >> something bad happening to the old one right? > > I don't know if anything bad happened to the old key. That's > fundamentally unknowable. But I decided to start using a new key. I suppose I should have been more specific than "something bad" :) I merely meant this wasn't an actual security issue of losing control of a private key, but merely moving to a new one for other reasons. In any event, this is a good reminder (to myself) to have backups of private keys somewhere safe!