From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id +AGeDTdDzmVTAQEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:00:39 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id +AGeDTdDzmVTAQEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:00:39 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=FloxLxIg; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1708016439; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Qe4zVn/ndNYbJ3X3VyEH31Kzf3dRb4GRykma8IwJmnA=; b=UtUH2SpwOOzQWdWJr4exIYA9OVPyxWj5fuPI0uI1w0AXSdTUP1MO8qeSyCkXQdIsPT5VcD OSXa547ALr3LQgLfIPEl4AEo7MrK4HM8X+vwLByIvDS6T43tke78NMHKYP6xVkOb9H5XpJ oI2NjoYwNRbiwKYCd26/2KFZ+PvadwT6JQTRUUaX2NLjcv1WNIQUDSq0fpg1BIoGCNn5EA iq0uEo4oPY+4gx0DwgQIkAncaWBXI+b3iG/BeXs0MPs9x0LbObPUYg7YH1+dANAcZePLKX PeOy52HOmDVAL7M/la8ib5/9cuEmtuIhx6sdyCuO9pvVJWvjfZmxaVLZeGVH3Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=FloxLxIg; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1708016439; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=c3tkrtPt3Jka0YbyMeBTmIarQNPXTnExR2+sHe9YvhFkZ+rB7M4LBWFJ6sF1gdeC3Nn6yH NRNRgnmvbMEo8pUnXZxIFg4OeS+9458MvaR7Pbcvvnw4DH9r7QSGd7oDSN2J70ijjy6afG JiZ5yvTLrTpe4cHjusWIgePgY0fDRdug75RJeY8DhpkSVC8vA/8hnISOx+yICe2/z142yI bN7MTZYhw9eCCgSHEobN2hR3uK4hv2FlWrMxKv4CdpxWcyZHG6PQxHa7gYcDPbTnJbZPzx nWM7Qtekxtn65kx8VDArY1qnvPHndnC6wOaNeSSJ8HzkiFDE/7Sd8GxMDduGgQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE284747AF for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:00:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1raf5e-0007jG-E0; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:00:02 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1raf5b-0007hs-Cp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:59:59 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1raf5Z-0007Q8-8o for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:59:58 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-33b30fc475eso38604f8f.1 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:59:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708016395; x=1708621195; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Qe4zVn/ndNYbJ3X3VyEH31Kzf3dRb4GRykma8IwJmnA=; b=FloxLxIg99s9fUIihK5/ZyUgy/1KbtVg7P60CMkzaj1n6SLEfUFb3PqZNqVbzmht7R N2LgT+jJ+cXhjEdq6VkmQkZs3s8etwqjOKS+TvG08lLjxQmypvJgejcX+LBbjWfH0Wfo aXpTL+VPheqKr93HMdR8ViLENZaVucvXKSmosutxuVw7vFRbZzwuIeYjLSs6vXKzQcR6 6IZjnkrMqeq8TiUnsfW71014EV1Ih+rmjeZeIIEo3hCNLULkcVEYNNWRKood0j6nvQBB Y8jetqRy0hj+cMJBBoEETGM3MXjItAD5macGVardMPIjxtjpHlO3mfJPSBH3cmBrug7N SF1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708016395; x=1708621195; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Qe4zVn/ndNYbJ3X3VyEH31Kzf3dRb4GRykma8IwJmnA=; b=RhAuBOd0nB5zzhGx7ZisXAigNalRzR+lN3fQd19+I5bidIq15swS3+FGka/4Fb0Uwl ilEvu7EvoCEKIYxYJGe70zK43uLtC7hc6+sPGp6/EB8EW3LsHe2Rk+Y+wr/vTtLy8pjk It/9CEIF74W4/haJRiQeDIu0skBfd6Drgb5GSF6Rivh9CRSBMybCbBjspp1HTYl0pXiR BmSnUryEDKk9FLzz/Y3/hlVgnCPhziBNF1+dJom3URSLbpt0qaAPt1tUQNXWmN7QSIRE 72qnEq6pL0Cp8p52fjWhlAf/lVV4x8R8GTmxWnbN6H0VLyL5uYs5sgaMuS0tVaMtLXAu neQg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX69oxn5RwFKEmbQHc8bgKsIUCj8qCTfBX8ttu0RN09oQKQlzIy+9+STeaa7PSYstUPDgEZtcdhHK7vK5lgy8ngeSs= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz8UvizAWxnfHRDaqnVOJGi0PsCf7pXVYXwsfTCLepS5qy0RgN3 4A1hnXlkF/xKswfW3zqtvYr3KWoHPy6SnZ7nfTFIYEKrEED531w0/2ckWWHr X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF8kNd96Vk8JQnXH6RWfvxDFZI+pQQdd8TwcX+/jqUmu9hg6/LHClaFrldxx6AYu/SIUnKTBw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1f0f:b0:33d:11a0:7589 with SMTP id bv15-20020a0560001f0f00b0033d11a07589mr779152wrb.6.1708016395358; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:59:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:7d85:9c0b:111:5112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x13-20020a5d60cd000000b0033b17880eacsm2292420wrt.56.2024.02.15.08.59.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:59:54 -0800 (PST) From: Simon Tournier To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Cc: Maxim Cournoyer , Kyle Meyer , Ricardo Wurmus , Josselin Poiret , Hartmut Goebel , Suhail , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion In-Reply-To: <87mss29cjh.fsf@lassieur.org> References: <87plx8fl2a.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> <87bk8s58p1.fsf@elephly.net> <87y1bv1xy0.fsf@kyleam.com> <87il2vvtw5.fsf@gmail.com> <87mss3kpxk.fsf@gmail.com> <87mss29cjh.fsf@lassieur.org> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:06:49 +0100 Message-ID: <8734tt98ra.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::429; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x429.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -4 X-Spam_score: -0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.28 X-Spam-Score: -5.28 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: DE284747AF X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: tWcgjkZEpHW1 Hi Cl=C3=A9ment, On jeu., 15 f=C3=A9vr. 2024 at 12:45, Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur wrote: >>> 'b4 shazam' is probably the most trouble-free way to apply patches; >> >> I agree*! > > I don't agree (both Gwene + Gnus or Emacs Debbugs work perfectly too and > allow to apply a range of n patches at once) but I don't think there is > a need for competition here, it's good that we have several tools. Yes for sure it is good to have several tools. And the ones you like. :-) No one is advocating to make =E2=80=99b4 shazam=E2=80=99 THE only one tool. Instead, I agree with Maxim that exposing Message-ID and relying on =E2=80= =99b4 shazam=E2=80=99 is the most trouble-free and config-less way to apply patch= es. >> What appears to me =E2=80=9Cdifficult=E2=80=9D is that = most of the >> tools as Email client are poorly supporting Message-ID. >> >> For instance, debbugs.el (Gnus). To my knowledge, there is not easy way >> to get the Message-ID when reading an article (bug/patch) from Debbugs. >> There is other means for applying patches. But still each time appears >> to me weird. :-) > > It's > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (with-current-buffer gnus-original-article-buffer > (message-fetch-field "Message-ID")) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- [...] > May I add too, that you can add "Message-ID" in gnus-visible-headers. And what about Summary buffer? Well, it makes my point, no? :-) For sure the Message-ID is there and for sure it is possible to extract it. However, it appears to me weird that it is not built-in. I mean Message-ID is one of the heart of Emails, and Debbugs is just Emails, but debbugs.el does not provide a built-in access to it. Cheers, simon