* Re: bug#74204: [bug#74112] Guix is not reproducible [not found] ` <87ed3pzora.wl-hako@ultrarare.space> @ 2024-11-07 17:54 ` Simon Tournier 2024-11-10 9:11 ` Maxim Cournoyer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Simon Tournier @ 2024-11-07 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hilton Chain, Jakob Kirsch; +Cc: Guix Devel, 74112-done, 74204-done Hi, On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 at 23:25, Hilton Chain via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org> wrote: >> I can confirm the reproducibility issue. >> >> I have two x86_64-linux machines building guix to verify the fix, I'll apply >> your patch once they produce matching outputs. > > Took me quite a while to build 5 rounds. :) > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > $ guix hash --serializer=nar /gnu/store/fs7x07jfn7igpkwv3alrs9by21q70y13-guix-1.4.0-26.5ab3c4c > 0kh87wb4qn97kwzrf4igal71cjvv143j6jr2y3dwfzcy1madj1ll > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Applied #74112 as 4c56d0cccdc44e12484b26332715f54768738c5f, thanks! Maybe I am missing something. To my knowledge, .go files produced by Guile are not always reproducible, see bug#20272 [1]. And, from my understanding, Guix cannot be reproducible until this bug had been fixed. Therefore, I am not convinced that this patch is worth under this frame considering the build-time penalty it brings. That’s said, maybe it’s better than nothing and the package ’guix’ is barely built after all. I do not know. What people think? Cheers, simon 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/20272 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: bug#74204: [bug#74112] Guix is not reproducible 2024-11-07 17:54 ` bug#74204: [bug#74112] Guix is not reproducible Simon Tournier @ 2024-11-10 9:11 ` Maxim Cournoyer 2024-11-14 10:01 ` Ludovic Courtès 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2024-11-10 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Tournier Cc: Hilton Chain, Jakob Kirsch, Guix Devel, 74112-done, 74204-done Hi Simon, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes: > Hi, > > On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 at 23:25, Hilton Chain via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org> wrote: > >>> I can confirm the reproducibility issue. >>> >>> I have two x86_64-linux machines building guix to verify the fix, I'll apply >>> your patch once they produce matching outputs. >> >> Took me quite a while to build 5 rounds. :) >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> $ guix hash --serializer=nar /gnu/store/fs7x07jfn7igpkwv3alrs9by21q70y13-guix-1.4.0-26.5ab3c4c >> 0kh87wb4qn97kwzrf4igal71cjvv143j6jr2y3dwfzcy1madj1ll >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> Applied #74112 as 4c56d0cccdc44e12484b26332715f54768738c5f, thanks! > > Maybe I am missing something. To my knowledge, .go files produced by > Guile are not always reproducible, see bug#20272 [1]. And, from my > understanding, Guix cannot be reproducible until this bug had been > fixed. Therefore, I am not convinced that this patch is worth under > this frame considering the build-time penalty it brings. > > That’s said, maybe it’s better than nothing and the package ’guix’ is > barely built after all. I do not know. > > What people think? Perhaps we should set the default parallel-build? to #f in the guile-build-system at least in the meantime, with a prominent comment as to why and a reference to the upstream issue? Many Guile packages use the gnu-build-system so that wouldn't cover all of them like 'guix'... I'm not sure. It'd be nicer to fix the underlying guile issue (again?), but I doubt many people are up to this. -- Thanks, Maxim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: bug#74204: [bug#74112] Guix is not reproducible 2024-11-10 9:11 ` Maxim Cournoyer @ 2024-11-14 10:01 ` Ludovic Courtès 2024-12-18 9:19 ` [bug#74112] " Maxim Cournoyer 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2024-11-14 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: Simon Tournier, Hilton Chain, Jakob Kirsch, Guix Devel, 74112-done, 74204-done Hi, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis: > Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes: [...] >> Maybe I am missing something. To my knowledge, .go files produced by >> Guile are not always reproducible, see bug#20272 [1]. And, from my >> understanding, Guix cannot be reproducible until this bug had been >> fixed. Therefore, I am not convinced that this patch is worth under >> this frame considering the build-time penalty it brings. >> >> That’s said, maybe it’s better than nothing and the package ’guix’ is >> barely built after all. I do not know. >> >> What people think? > > Perhaps we should set the default parallel-build? to #f in the > guile-build-system at least in the meantime, with a prominent comment as > to why and a reference to the upstream issue? Many Guile packages use > the gnu-build-system so that wouldn't cover all of them like > 'guix'... I'm not sure. Sounds good to me: packages using ‘guile-build-system’ are usually relatively small so the impact is negligible. ‘guix’ is a little different because it takes so much time to build sequentially… Ludo’. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [bug#74112] bug#74204: [bug#74112] Guix is not reproducible 2024-11-14 10:01 ` Ludovic Courtès @ 2024-12-18 9:19 ` Maxim Cournoyer 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Maxim Cournoyer @ 2024-12-18 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ludovic Courtès Cc: 74112-done, Jakob Kirsch, Simon Tournier, Hilton Chain, Guix Devel Hi, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes: [...] >> Perhaps we should set the default parallel-build? to #f in the >> guile-build-system at least in the meantime, with a prominent comment as >> to why and a reference to the upstream issue? Many Guile packages use >> the gnu-build-system so that wouldn't cover all of them like >> 'guix'... I'm not sure. > > Sounds good to me: packages using ‘guile-build-system’ are usually > relatively small so the impact is negligible. That's now tackled in #74909. -- Thanks, Maxim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-18 9:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <ZykUqu7t4WuUF9kj@kernelpanicroom>
[not found] ` <ZyJ1wSX6cPIdnLpN@kernelpanicroom>
[not found] ` <87fro6yntj.wl-hako@ultrarare.space>
[not found] ` <87ed3pzora.wl-hako@ultrarare.space>
2024-11-07 17:54 ` bug#74204: [bug#74112] Guix is not reproducible Simon Tournier
2024-11-10 9:11 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2024-11-14 10:01 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-12-18 9:19 ` [bug#74112] " Maxim Cournoyer
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).