From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Including additional modules in dmd services
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:03:51 +0100
Message-ID: <871tbkix88.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87bnap49hw.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46838)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ZzmIA-0006y9-S1
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:03:59 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1ZzmI6-0001tb-Pe
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:03:58 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87bnap49hw.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	(David Thompson's message of "Thu, 19 Nov 2015 22:47:55 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> skribis:

> Am I just doing it wrong?  If it's a real limitation, what would be the
> best way to specify the additional modules needed?  I looked around at
> the various dmd services and couldn't find any other examples of needing
> macros from another module.  I would love to know how to resolve this so
> that I can continue my quest of managing user SSH keys with a dmd
> service.

No you=E2=80=99re not doing it wrong!  It just happens that the current lis=
t of
modules visible to dmd code is hard-coded in =E2=80=98dmd-configuration-fil=
e=E2=80=99,
in (gnu services dmd).

Short-term workaround is to add (ice-9 match) there.

Longer-term, I=E2=80=99d like to have each service in its own file, with it=
s own
set of modules.  =E2=80=98dmd-service=E2=80=99 would presumably have a new =
=E2=80=98modules=E2=80=99
field for that.

I=E2=80=99ll look into it.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.