From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gtk-engines and murrine.
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 13:42:57 +0800
Message-ID: <871t8qbdi6.fsf@member.fsf.org>
References: <1454621216-8931-1-git-send-email-fhmgufs@web.de>
	<CAJ=RwfZTwgk0gS7eL5ONAq8vjQOLCPN5ibtKwsm-TjM7cogV1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<87powbws62.fsf@elephly.net> <20160205091107.6a6949d5@alarmpi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51928)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@openmailbox.org>) id 1aRveX-0004QF-VF
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 00:43:26 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@openmailbox.org>) id 1aRveU-0000fT-Nz
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 00:43:25 -0500
Received: from smtp25.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.59]:44755)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@openmailbox.org>) id 1aRveU-0000fO-IF
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 00:43:22 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20160205091107.6a6949d5@alarmpi> (Fabian Harfert's message of
	"Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:11:07 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Fabian Harfert <fhmgufs@web.de>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Fabian Harfert <fhmgufs@web.de> writes:

> On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:08:21 +0100
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Fabian,
>> 
>> I wonder if this will work out of the box.  Where does GTK+ look for
>> engines?  Was the patch enough to GTK+ to make it respect
>> GUIX_GTK2_PATH and GUIX_GTK3_PATH?
>> 
>> Or will we need to add some additional procedure to building profiles
>> to generate a cache or a list of engines expected by GTK+?  (I know
>> that at least for input method modules something like that will be
>> needed.)
>> 
>> ~~ Ricardo
>> 
>
> Hi!
>
> Because the gtk-xfce-engine from xfce.scm doesn't need this I thought
> that this is the case for these engines, too. But really, I don't know
> how this is handled. If I install the package to my profile, which is
> included in the GUIX_GTK2_PATH, they are found by Gtk+.
Yes, the engines can be found by GUIX_GTK2_PATH, but I think the themes
need manually link to ~/.themes.

I replace 'Gtk+ 2' with 'GTK+ 2.x', and add a copyright header for you.
Patches pushed, thanks!