From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix guile-emacs build failure
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 20:58:20 +0100
Message-ID: <871t7wd2ub.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <874mcsd3ha.fsf@elephly.net>
	<20160228215032.78a4a22a@debian-netbook>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48347)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aa7U9-0007kt-DZ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:58:34 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aa7U6-0000lQ-54
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:58:33 -0500
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:25679)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aa7U5-0000lH-T2
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:58:30 -0500
In-reply-to: <20160228215032.78a4a22a@debian-netbook>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

> On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 20:44:33 +0100
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:
>
>> @@ -255,7 +256,16 @@ without requiring the source code to be rewritten.")
>>         ("flex" ,flex)
>>         ("texinfo" ,texinfo)
>>         ("gettext" ,gnu-gettext)
>> -       ,@(package-native-inputs guile-next)))))
>> +       ,@(package-native-inputs guile-next)))
>> +    ;; Same as in guile-2.0
>> +    (native-search-paths
>> +     (list (search-path-specification
>> +            (variable "GUILE_LOAD_PATH")
>> +            (files '("share/guile/site/2.0")))
>> +           (search-path-specification
>> +            (variable "GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH")
>> +            (files '("lib/guile/2.0/ccache"
>> +                     "share/guile/site/2.0")))))))
>>  
>
> What happens if you're building it with guile-next? Doesn't the search-path
> need to be 2.2 or something similar?

Guile Emacs currently needs to be built with “guile-for-guile-emacs”,
which contains custom patches AFAIU.

Currently the “native-search-path” field is inherited from “guile-next”
and thus contains “2.2” in the paths.  This is the reason why Guile
Emacs currently cannot be built.

~~ Ricardo