From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Requesting advice on ImageMagick popen() filename vulnerability (CVE-2016-5118) Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 23:12:28 +0200 Message-ID: <871t4ind8j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160531170205.GA355@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57043) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7qxp-0002bl-5W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 17:12:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b7qxj-0004l7-TW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2016 17:12:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160531170205.GA355@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 31 May 2016 13:02:05 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > I plan to fix this in our package using the "crude" option until > ImageMagick releases a new version, which seems to be happening every > few days. It sounds reasonable. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.