From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 11:23:19 +0200
Message-ID: <871szrurco.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <877f9kufxx.fsf@elephly.net>
	<CAL1_imkC6_ySYouso9n3gWiaGfbb2XX5f+yxhACsE6pr-FVzGg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47492)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1bsnqu-00033z-Bq
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 05:23:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1bsnqq-0004Oh-2j
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 05:23:31 -0400
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:21315)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1bsnqp-0004OO-P2
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 05:23:28 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAL1_imkC6_ySYouso9n3gWiaGfbb2XX5f+yxhACsE6pr-FVzGg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>


David Craven <david@craven.ch> writes:

>> What do you think?  The alternative is to drop Texmaker and all the
>> other packages that depend on Chromium as distributed by Qt.
>
> Weren't you vocal on IRC about bundling and the hell it brings? Sounds
> like bundling is ok when it suits you... :)

I have no problems dropping Texmaker.  I’m not even using it.

~~ Ricardo