From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re:Re: Suggest add font: font-wqy-microhei Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 14:37:29 +0000 Message-ID: <871sw5g11y.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <452bcab7.22cd.1599584719b.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <20170113105146.162bc10b@scratchpost.org> <49d708f1.9e82.159986723ef.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <20170113222351.19739f31@scratchpost.org> <3c150dcc.d15.1599a909771.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37986) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSPRm-00063N-BV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 09:36:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSPRj-0002hY-8R for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 09:36:46 -0500 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:53245) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSPRj-0002h5-0O for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 09:36:43 -0500 Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSPRg-0003rl-BW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:36:40 +0100 Received: from [89.187.143.81] (helo=localhost) by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1cSPRY-0005gv-Tn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:36:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3c150dcc.d15.1599a909771.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi, tumashu writes: > If we need to use "fc-cache -f", suggest add it to document. Maybe we finally have enough fonts to justify a font-build-system, which would run "fc-cache -f" at the end of it, or do something similar? I have often seen this (and done this) when I used Gentoo. > At 2017-01-14 05:23:55, "Danny Milosavljevic" wrote: >>Hi, >> >>On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 23:16:53 +0800 (CST) >>tumashu wrote: >> >>> When I install a font with a non-root account, the font just can't be found by "fc-list", >>> and run "fc-cache" is useless too, But run "fc-cache -f" can cache the installed font, >>> it it a bug or just my machine problom? >> >>I don't know, sorry. It may be that fc-cache uses timestamps (mtime) to figure out whether a directory changed or not and that won't work for us since we always use the same mtime (for reproducibility). But that's just a guess - I hope someone else knows it... >> What do you think? -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/