From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Please write "Update to <version>" instead of "Update snapshot"
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 23:09:14 +0100
Message-ID: <871skkvgj9.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87d145vpi8.fsf@netris.org> <20171126190315.GB30789@jasmine.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60259)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1eJ579-0007GL-E9
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:09:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1eJ574-0007cp-7f
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:09:27 -0500
Received: from [2a01:474::1] (port=34187 helo=hera.aquilenet.fr)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1eJ574-0007cO-0N
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:09:22 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20171126190315.GB30789@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of
	"Sun, 26 Nov 2017 14:03:15 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Heya,

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 07:43:11PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> In my opinion, the version number is a very useful piece of information
>> to see for update commits when browsing the commit history.  I regard
>> the practice of omitting the version number to be a slowly creeping
>> regression in our otherwise exceptionally good conventions for commit
>> logs.  I humbly propose that we nip this regression in the bud.
>
> I agree that the commit message should always include the new version of
> the package being updated.

I plaid guilty here, but yes, I agree with giving a commit ID in the
summary line when updating the =E2=80=98guix=E2=80=99 package and others.

Apologies for the confusion.

Ludo=E2=80=99.