From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Successfully running GNOME on core-updates + staging Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 21:55:39 +0200 Message-ID: <871sf7hv7o.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8736zp571h.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57159) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAL5P-0002cp-D5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:55:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAL5K-00057p-Hf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:55:47 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:44620) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fAL5K-00057L-Ao for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 15:55:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8736zp571h.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Sat, 21 Apr 2018 03:54:02 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver skribis: > I've successfully updated my x86_64 GuixSD system to my private branch > based on 'core-updates' with recent 'master' and 'staging' merged into > it. This system includes a full GNOME desktop environment plus a few > programs based on Qt. It all works quite well. > > My branch includes a few draft fixes and workarounds that I haven't yet > pushed, but nothing that would require many rebuilds to update later. > > So, I think it might be time to ask Hydra to build all of core-updates, > after staging is merged into it. I agree. There was an issue with cross-compiling =E2=80=98bootstrap-tarbal= ls=E2=80=99 that Marius reported a few days ago, which I=E2=80=99m looking into right n= ow. I don=E2=80=99t expect the fix(es) to trigger a full rebuild. If Marius and others don=E2=80=99t object, I=E2=80=99d say go for it! Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.