From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:53:43 +0100 Message-ID: <871ruxgvaw.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <20191018205608.45b264dc@kompiuter> <87ftjpyhsz.fsf@devup.no> <87mudxhzv8.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191019223821.71b6dd45@interia.pl> <87a79vd4ee.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <8736fgn9zu.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191025214435.4a0892a8@interia.pl> <87imoblsrn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191027012445.636b1070@interia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iOzqX-0003Eb-Dy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 03:53:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOzqV-0003Nu-HH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 03:53:49 -0400 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:43029) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iOzqV-0003Mt-BM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 03:53:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20191027012445.636b1070@interia.pl> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Wielkiewicz Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Got your 3 emails! :) >> Have you tried using pjproject >> 5dfa75be7d69047387f9b0436dd9492bbbf03fe4 ? >> Does the patching still fail? > I've tried this today and it still fails. Don't know if the fails with > the exact commit are much different from 2.9 fetched from the tarball. > If they're not different, then you can see what happens in one of my > comments here > https://git.ring.cx/savoirfairelinux/ring-project/issues/691 Then this is not related to the Guix packages or the inputs, it's related to the source you are fetching. What if you `diff -r` the offending package in the third party folder with the aforementioned commit? The Jami developer should know more about this. I'm starting to be a little scared of how out of hands dep management goes :p =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl22nocACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH8wJQf8DEtuWaxOngsZKgEt6O0uhCYEBXloksykP9gsMRobA2NJbFr7bOc0NckS EenoqZo+aMte2E2WhFz7gLIwtiUEE2nx0AZl9PKANwHVZy44iwG9uWYtYadPaEYy Tr4qUgoZhvGaX6rGCWlXZY82JYJ0snl8KTslvFRM4AubaaF5DYgqMg5PxyDutPsv Ui2HQ3LBcx9I6YFYWT2YPEgWWowlsRRLkxBpQdi+aOCeSM4/ddfWvjtprfvPQGdW VV4ckAsVBGjp8+mElq5ReQZahwkZ1P78a4l5n0w1y7oUcmJJoBEIxS7gaaAblVk/ kuLig2sYEBeoD0fKd015lng9tdPQlg== =7BKd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--