From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Commit log for reverts
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2020 23:19:52 +0100
Message-ID: <871rsen9tj.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
References: <20200104021546.29233.46519@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <20200104021547.7701D215EC@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57519)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1inrm0-00057H-B4
 for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2020 17:19:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20200104021547.7701D215EC@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 (guix-commits@gnu.org's message of "Fri, 3 Jan 2020 21:15:47 -0500
 (EST)")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Guix-devel <Guix-devel@gnu.org>

Hola!

guix-commits@gnu.org skribis:

> commit a06a4f918243dc784f9089d60690559b72a4e308
> Author: Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org>
> Date:   Fri Jan 3 20:15:44 2020 -0600
>
>     Revert "gnu: Add swi-prolog."
>=20=20=20=20=20
>     This reverts commit 3f37f3909712eb7269b6e8184c0d61bfc61b67f9.

When reverting changes, I think we should always add a sentence possibly
with a link explaining the revert, to make it easier to those of us
reading guix-commits and to our future selves looking at the commit log
and wondering what was going on back then.  :-)

Thoughts?

(Anyhow, I=E2=80=99m glad SWI-Prolog eventually made it!)

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.